Wing Morphology and Echolocation of Rhinopoma hardwickii (Lesser Mouse-tailed Bat, Gray, 1831)
Main Article Content
Abstract
Rhinopoma hardwickii is currently classified as a member of the Yinpterochiroptera suborder, which includes frugivorous and some insectivorous bats. This species is the smallest in the Rhinopomatidae family and easily identified by its long tail. The wing morphology and echolocation calls of this species were studies to see if there were any changes in wing morphology between sexes, echolocation calls across different environments such as natural (roost and field) and controlled (captive), as well as different geographical areas. In this study, a total of 41 individuals (27 male and 14 female) of R. hardwickii were captured and their wing morphology was measured. The results show that there were no statistically significant variations in their morphometric characteristics or in wing morphology between the sexes. This species has with high wing loading and a high aspect ratio, as well as pointed wing tips. The echolocation calls consisted up to five harmonics of FM and CF- FM sweeps. Peak frequencies, start frequency, end frequency, and IPI of three separate environment parameters (roost, capitative, and field recording) differed significantly (p > 0.001).Moreover, we compared the frequency at maximum energy with four different geographical regions such as Kerala, Gujrat, and Israel to current study, and found that the frequencies of bat calls do not vary with geographical region (H=0.667, df=3, p=0.881). Therefore, the current study provides accurate identification of R. hardwickii on the basis of echolocation call in a different environment. The echolocation call and wing morphology data clearly show that this species is a fast flyer with limited manoeuvrability that feeds on forest canopy or over water bodies.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Transfer of Copyrights
- In the event of publication of the manuscript entitled [INSERT MANUSCRIPT TITLE AND REF NO.] in the Malaysian Journal of Science, I hereby transfer copyrights of the manuscript title, abstract and contents to the Malaysian Journal of Science and the Faculty of Science, University of Malaya (as the publisher) for the full legal term of copyright and any renewals thereof throughout the world in any format, and any media for communication.
Conditions of Publication
- I hereby state that this manuscript to be published is an original work, unpublished in any form prior and I have obtained the necessary permission for the reproduction (or am the owner) of any images, illustrations, tables, charts, figures, maps, photographs and other visual materials of whom the copyrights is owned by a third party.
- This manuscript contains no statements that are contradictory to the relevant local and international laws or that infringes on the rights of others.
- I agree to indemnify the Malaysian Journal of Science and the Faculty of Science, University of Malaya (as the publisher) in the event of any claims that arise in regards to the above conditions and assume full liability on the published manuscript.
Reviewer’s Responsibilities
- Reviewers must treat the manuscripts received for reviewing process as confidential. It must not be shown or discussed with others without the authorization from the editor of MJS.
- Reviewers assigned must not have conflicts of interest with respect to the original work, the authors of the article or the research funding.
- Reviewers should judge or evaluate the manuscripts objective as possible. The feedback from the reviewers should be express clearly with supporting arguments.
- If the assigned reviewer considers themselves not able to complete the review of the manuscript, they must communicate with the editor, so that the manuscript could be sent to another suitable reviewer.
Copyright: Rights of the Author(s)
- Effective 2007, it will become the policy of the Malaysian Journal of Science (published by the Faculty of Science, University of Malaya) to obtain copyrights of all manuscripts published. This is to facilitate:
- Protection against copyright infringement of the manuscript through copyright breaches or piracy.
- Timely handling of reproduction requests from authorized third parties that are addressed directly to the Faculty of Science, University of Malaya.
- As the author, you may publish the fore-mentioned manuscript, whole or any part thereof, provided acknowledgement regarding copyright notice and reference to first publication in the Malaysian Journal of Science and Faculty of Science, University of Malaya (as the publishers) are given. You may produce copies of your manuscript, whole or any part thereof, for teaching purposes or to be provided, on individual basis, to fellow researchers.
- You may include the fore-mentioned manuscript, whole or any part thereof, electronically on a secure network at your affiliated institution, provided acknowledgement regarding copyright notice and reference to first publication in the Malaysian Journal of Science and Faculty of Science, University of Malaya (as the publishers) are given.
- You may include the fore-mentioned manuscript, whole or any part thereof, on the World Wide Web, provided acknowledgement regarding copyright notice and reference to first publication in the Malaysian Journal of Science and Faculty of Science, University of Malaya (as the publishers) are given.
- In the event that your manuscript, whole or any part thereof, has been requested to be reproduced, for any purpose or in any form approved by the Malaysian Journal of Science and Faculty of Science, University of Malaya (as the publishers), you will be informed. It is requested that any changes to your contact details (especially e-mail addresses) are made known.
Copyright: Role and responsibility of the Author(s)
- In the event of the manuscript to be published in the Malaysian Journal of Science contains materials copyrighted to others prior, it is the responsibility of current author(s) to obtain written permission from the copyright owner or owners.
- This written permission should be submitted with the proof-copy of the manuscript to be published in the Malaysian Journal of Science
Licensing Policy
Malaysian Journal of Science is an open-access journal that follows the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0)
CC BY – NC 4.0: Under this licence, the reusers to distribute, remix, alter, and build upon the content in any media or format for non-commercial purposes only, as long as proper acknowledgement is given to the authors of the original work. Please take the time to read the whole licence agreement (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode ).
References
Amichai E., Blumrosen G and Yovel Y. (2015) Calling louder and longer: how bats use biosonar under severe acoustic interference from other bats. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 282: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.2064
Barclay R M R., Fullard J H and Jacobs D S. (1999) Variation in the echolocation calls of the hoary bat (Lasiurus cinereus): influence of body size, habitat structure, and geo graphic location. Canadian Journal of Zoology 77: 530–534. DOI: 10.1139/cjz-77-4-530
Bartonicka T and Rehak Z. (2005) Variability in echolocation calls of Pipistrellus pygmaeus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) during search flight in different habitats, Acta Theriologica 50 (2): 145–160. DOI: 10.1007/BF03194478
Bates P., Bumrungsri S., Francis C., Csorba G., Walston J., Molur S and Srinivasulu C. (2008) Arielulus circumdatus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species e.T41534A10493431. https://dx.doi.org/ 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T41534A10493431.en.
Bates P J J and Harrison D L. (1997) Bats of the Indian subcontinent. Harrison zoological museum, Publications, Sevenoaks 258pp. https://doi.org/10.2307/1383036
Benda P., Andreas V H., Reiter M A and Uhrin M. (2004) Two new species of bats (Chiroptera) for the fauna of Libya: Rhinopoma hardwickii and Pipistrellus rueppellii, MYOTIS 41-42: 109-124.
Berger-tal O., Berger-tal R., Korine C., Holderied M W and Fenton M B. (2008) Echolocation calls produced by Kuhl’s pipistrelles in different flight situations, Journal of Zoology 274: 59–64. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2007.00357.x
Broders H G., Findlay C S and Zheng L. (2004) Effects of clutter on echolocation call structure of Myotis septentrionalis and M. lucifugus, Journal of Mammalogy 85: 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1644/BWG-102
Brunnich M T. (1782) Dyrenes Histoireog Dyre-Samlingenudi Universitets Natur-Theater. Nicolaus Moller, Copenhagen 4: 1-76.
Chiu C., Xian W and Moss C F. (2009) Adaptive echolocation behavior in bats for the analysis of auditory scenes, Journal of Experimental Biology 212: 1392–1404. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.027045
Dobson G E. (1878) Catalogue of the Chiroptera in the Collection of the British Museum London: British Museum, Nature 18, 585–586. https://doi.org/10.1038/018585a0
Duffy A M., Lumsden L F., Caddle C R., Chick R R and Newell G R. (2000) The efficacy of Anabat ultrasonic detectors and harp traps for surveying microchiropterans in south-eastern Australia, Acta Chiropterologica 2(2): 127–144.
Freeman P W. (1981) A multivariate study of the family (Molossidae Mammalia, Chiroptera): Morphology, ecology, evolution. Fieldiana Zoology, New Series 7: 1–173. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.3128
Gannon W L., O’Farrell M J., Corben C and Bedrick E J. (2004) Call character lexicon and analysis of field recordings of bat echolocation calls. Pp. 478–484, in Echo - location in bats and dolphins (eds. J.A. Thomas, C.F. Moss, and M. Vater). The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA 604 pp.
Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire E. (1818) Description de I’Egypt. Historire naturelle. Description des mammiferes qui se trouvent en, Egypte 2: 99- 135.
Gillam E H and Mccracken G F. (2007) Variability in the echolocation of Tadarida brasiliensis: effects of geography and local acoustic environment, Animal Behaviour 74: 277–286. DOI:10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.12.006
Gray J E. (1831) Description of some new genera and species of bats, The Zoological Miscellany 1: 37-38.
Griffin D R., Webster F A and Michael C R. (1960) The echolocation of flying insects by bats, Animal Behaviour 8 (3-4): 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(60)90022-1
Habersetzer J. (1981) Adaptive echolocation sounds in the bat Rhinopoma hardwickei, Journal of Comparative Physiology 144: 559–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01326841
Habersetzer J. (1986) Vergleichende fl?gelmorphologische Untersuchungen an einer Fledermausgesellschaft in Madurai. In Biona Reporte, Bat flight – Fledermausflug, ed. W. Nachtigall, 75-106. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer.
Hackett T D., Holderied M W and Korine C. (2016) Echolocation call description of 15 species of Middle-Eastern desert dwelling insectivorous bats, Bioacoustics 26: 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2016.1247386
Harrison D L. (1964) The mammals of Arabia. Ernest Benn Ltd., London 1:1-192
Hill J E. (1977) A review of the Rhinopomatidae (Mammalia: Chiroptera), Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Zoology 32 (2): 29-43.
Jones G and Teeling E C. (2006) The evolution of echolocation in bats, Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21(3): 149–156. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.01.001
Jones G and Kokurewicz T. (1994) Sex and age variation in echolocation calls and flight morphology of Daubenton’s bats Myotis daubentonii, Mammalia 58: 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1515/mamm.1994.58.1.41.
Kalko E K V and Schnitzler H U. (1993) Plasticity in echolocation signals of European pipistrelle bats in search flight: implications for habitat use and prey detection. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 33: 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170257
Kingdon J. (1974) East African Mammals: An Atlas of Evolution in Africa vol. II, part A (Insectivores and Bats). University of Chicago Press.
Koopman K F. (1993) Order Chiroptera. In Mammal Species of the World. In A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference, ed. Wilson DE, Reeder DM, 137-241. Washington and London: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Koopman K F. (1994) Chiroptera: Systematics. Handbook of Zoology. Volume VIII. Mammalia Berlin and New York.
Law B S., Reinhold L and Pennay M. (2002) Geographic variation in the echolocation calls of Vespadelus spp. (Vespertilionidae) from New South Wales and Queensland, Australia. Acta Chiropterologica 4: 201–215. https://doi.org/10.3161/001.004.0208
Marinello M M and Bernard E. (2014) Wing morphology of Neotropical bats: a quantitative and qualitative analysis with implications for habitat use, Canadian Journal of Zoology 92 (2): 141–147. https://doi.org10.1139/cjz-2013-0127
Masters W M., Raver K A S and Kazial K A. (1995) Sonar signals of big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus, contain information about individual identity, age and family affiliation, Animal Behaviour 50 (5): 1243–1260. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(95)80041-7
Murray K L., Britzke E R and Robinsons L W. (2001) Variation in search phase call of bats, Journal of Mammolgy 82(3): 728 – 737. https://doi.org/10.1644/1545-1542
Neuweiler G. (1984) Foraging, echolocation and audition in bats, Naturwissenschaften 71: 446-455. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00455897
Norberg U M L., Brooke A P And Trewhella W J. (2000) Soaring and non-soaring bats of the family Pteropodidae (flying foxes, Pteropus spp.): wing morphology and flight performance, The Journal of Experimental Biology 203 (3): 651–664. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.203.3.651
Norberg U M and Rayner J M V. (1987) Ecological morphology and Flight in bats (Mammalia; Chiroptera): wing adaptations, Flight performance, foraging strategy and echolocation, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 316 (1179): 335-427. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1987.0030
O’farrell M J., Corben C and Gannon W L. (2000) Geographic variation in the echolocation calls of the hoary bat (Lasiurus cinereus), Acta Chiropterologica 2 (2): 185–195.
Obrist M K. (1995) Flexible bat echolocation: the influence of individual, habitat and conspecifics on sonar signal design, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 36 (3): 207–219. DOI: 10.1007/BF00177798
Pennycuick C J. (1989) Bird Flight Performance: a Practical Calculation Manual. Oxford: Oxford University Press 153pp.
Prakash I. (1961) Die Saugetiere der Rajasthan—Wustein Indien. Nature 91:443-448.
Purohit A K and Senacha K R. (2004) Distribution of bats in and around Jaisalmer of the Great Indian Desert, India, Vespertilio 8: 99-104.
Ratcliffe J M., Hofstede H M T., Avila-Flores R., Fenton M B., McCracken G F., Biscardi S., Blasko J., Gillam E., Orprecio J and Spanjer G. (2004) Conspecifics influence call design in the Brazilian free-tailed bat, Tadarida brasiliensis, Canadian Journal of Zoology 82(6):966–971. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-2017-0284
Reinhold L., Herr A., Lumsden L., Reardon T., Corben C., Law B., Prevett P., Ford G., Conole L., Kutt A., Milne D and Hoye G. (2001) Geographic variation in the echolocation calls of Gould’s wattled bat Chalinolobus gouldii, Australian Zoologist 31 (4): 618–624. https://doi.org/10.7882/AZ.2001.008
Shah T A and Srinivasulu C. (2020) Echolocation calls of some bats of Gujarat, India, Mammalia 84 (5): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2019-0015
Sikes R S., William L G and the Animal Care and Use Committee of the American Society of Mammalogists. (2011) Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research, Journal of Mammalogy 92(1): 235-253. DOI: 10.1644/10-MAMM-F-355.1
Simmons J A and Stein R A. (1980) Acoustic imaging in bat sonar: echolocation signals and the evolution of echolocation, Journal of Comparative Physiology 135:61-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00660182
Singh S., Misra P K and Elangovan V. (2021) Distribution of Sheath-Tailed bats (Emballonuridae) in Bundelkhand region of Uttar Pradesh, Journal of Advanced Zoology 42 (2): 176–185. https://doi.org/10.17762/jaz.v42i02.52
Smith J D and Starrett A. (1979) Morphometric analysis of chiropteran wings. In Biology of bats of the New World family Phyllostomidae, ed. R. J. Baker, J. K. Jones, Jr., and D. C. Carter. 427-437. Special Publication Museum Texas Tech University.
Srinivasulu B and Srinivasulu C. (2017) A first record of three hitherto unreported species of bats from Kerala, India with a note on Myotis peytoni (Mammalia: Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae), Journal off Threattened Taxa 9 (5): 10216–10222. DOI: 10.11609/jott.3324.9.5.10216-10222
Thomas D W., Bell G P and Fenton M B. (1987) Variation in echolocation call frequencies recorded from North American vespertilionid bats: a cautionary note, Journal of Mammalogy 68 (4): 842–847. https://doi.org/10.2307/1381562
Thomas O. (1903) On the species of the genus Rhinopoma, Annals and Magazine of Natural History 11(7): 496-499.
Ulanovsky N., Fenton M B., Tsoar A and Korine C. (2004) Dynamics of jamming avoidance in echolocating bats, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 271 (1547): 1467–1475. doi:10.1098/rspb. 2004.2750
Van Cakenberghe V., De Vree F. (1994) A revision of the Rhinopomatidae Dobson 1872 with the description of a new subspecies (Mammalia: Chiroptera), Senckenbergiana Biologica 73 (1-2):1-24.
Van Valen L. (1979) The Evolution of Bats, Evolutionary theory 4:103-121.
Winge H. (1941) The interrelationship of the mammalian genera (English translation edited by S. Jensen, R. Spark and H. Volke). 2 Rodentia, Carnivora, Primates. Copenhagen: C. A. Reitzels Forlag.